Doctor, Chemist Murdered for Exposing Harmful Ingredient in Shots

 https://www.bitchute.com/video/Ervbi96YgrzG/

Dr. Andreas Noack, a respected and successful German chemist, died suddenly and mysteriously on 11/26/21 after releasing videos claiming the nano-material graphene hydroxide was found in vaccine samples.  Above is a portion of his final presentation on the subject where he described the microscopic particles being like tiny “razor blades” for cells and tissue.  Having done his doctoral thesis on the subject, Dr. Noack differentiated between graphene oxide and graphene hydroxide, though they are similar in composition.  He also pointed out that most doctors will not see its presence in blood samples using conventional microscopes and testing methods.  (Apologies if any of these links are not working as you read this, but this story clearly involves censorship and a cover-up, so some of these videos may be affected.)

https://www.bitchute.com/video/hlFTA7Qsp5kM/

For anyone mistakenly thinking Dr. Noack’s death is random or unrelated to his disclosure efforts, above is an earlier video presentation where he is interrupted by a police raid.  He is clearly shocked and concerned, as he has no history of committing or inciting any violence, but is forced onto the ground at gunpoint, preventing him from sharing any more information on the conference call.  The police then cover and turn the camera away from the arrest, then terminate the feed.  This shows that Dr. Noack was already being targeted since he had no criminal background, and the timing of the raid clearly disrupted the sharing of his knowledge and expertise.  Dr. Noack’s pregnant girlfriend confirmed his death in an emotional YouTube video praising his work and bravery, and encouraging others to share this information as a tribute to his sacrifice.  She then posted another video describing in detail how Dr. Noack suddenly died and her suspicions of foul play.  For those who are unaware, there are various covert weapons which affect individuals in a way that many doctors misinterpret as "natural causes" since they don't know about such technologies.  (Warning, I got choked up watching her struggle to get through these.)

https://www.bitchute.com/video/acc2rp9Z0dNF/

https://www.bitchute.com/video/AUQtKfJDRvcc/

Since cases of adverse effects from these shots are being intentionally omitted or “fact-checked” (censored) from a lot of mainstream media, many individuals are unaware that there is anything suspicious going on.  Countless people have been conditioned and programmed to label anyone who questions the efficacy or quality of these pharmaceutical products as an “anti-vaxer”, a childish tactic of name-calling that over-simplifies an incredibly complex topic.  This is one-dimensional thinking, and reality is NOT one-dimensional.  There is not just one vaccine, and there is not just one kind of person, so effects vary.  (Some even argue that what is being given is not even technically a vaccine, and that this word is misleading.)  But for those who are oblivious to the negative examples left out of media that is heavily influenced by drug companies, below are two montages of athletes who have suffered severe reactions (including death) after being inoculated.

https://www.bitchute.com/video/IIclxr7UurZj/

https://www.bitchute.com/video/z3Zyt3BTHwye/

According to Dr. Noack, this is occurring due to the increased cardio-vascular activity of athletes during peak physical performance.  More blood pressure moves whatever is in the blood throughout the body more vigorously; so if there is something harmful present, being more active spreads it faster.  Note that this does not happen to everyone, so do not become alarmed if you have had one of these dubious injections.  Everyone has their own lives, bodies, and paths which are unique. This is why mandates are so ineffective because they incorrectly presume that what works for one must work for all.  That is clearly not the case, as even something as uncontroversial as penicillin is recognized as being helpful for some, but others are allergic to it and will die from it.  So prescribing the same treatment for everyone is guaranteed to kill some people, even if it works wonders for many.  This is a main reason for so much resistance to such barbaric and misguided attempts to force pharmaceutical products into the bodies of everyone, even children (who know just as much as many adults about what is actually in the syringes!)

The raid and murder of Dr. Noack actually gives credence to his claims, and he is not the only one making them.  If he was lying, would an armed intrusion be an appropriate response to stop him from spreading misinformation?  Certainly not, so this tactic is even less justified when someone is telling the truth.  Then it becomes an atrocity and an attack on us all, preventing greater knowledge from being shared.  In a just and civilized society, every point of view is allowed to be expressed; but in this one, truth is often suppressed while lies and propaganda run rampant.  Even if someone is subjectively incorrect, open debate allows for learning; but killing or silencing anyone with a different point of view creates animosity and limited thinking.  Dr. Noack reminds people in his final video that “disputation” is crucial in any scientific development.  Not allowing any new information is inherently UN-scientific, close-minded, and dangerous.  Combined with his years of specialized experience, does this sound like a man who was a threat to society?  Or is the real threat those who target people like him for sharing information they see as a threat to their agendas?

Recognizing Lies, Fear-Mongering Propaganda, Psychological Warfare, and Negative Agendas in News

https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/nation/2021/11/24/pentagon-group-track-ufo-threats-national-security/8751603002/

1: Note how “news” sources keep showing the same photo and footage, as if this is the only contact that has ever happened!  In reality, TONS of contacts have taken place, they’re just showing this one over and over to perpetuate the illusion of scarcity.  Encounters both in craft and in person are not as rare or new as this media wants you to think.  It is attempting to cover up the fact that the same media sources have been lying to everyone.

https://www.cnn.com/videos/business/2021/07/23/ufo-report-national-security-threat-jm-gr-orig.cnn 

2: Note how these craft are always labeled “UFO” or “UAP”, the “U” in both standing for UN-identified or UN-explained.  In reality, these are craft very much identified and explained by all kinds of people: military, civilians, scientists, etc.  These terms are attempting to psychologically suggest mystery, ignorance, and the unknown.

https://www.newyorker.com/podcast/the-new-yorker-radio-hour/are-ufos-a-national-security-threat 

3: Note how they are commonly labeled a threat.  In reality, most of the beings in these craft are VERY loving, positive, and helpful, sharing knowledge and technology that the same military has been using in covert projects and keeping from the public (like free energy, anti-gravity, and advanced healing tech.)  Other examples of these gifts are already widely available, like fiber-optics, teflon, kevlar, and microchips that we are using right now.  All these developments and many more have been reverse-engineered and disseminated from ET tech.  The more revolutionary ones have been shown to us but labeled science “fiction” so people don’t believe they are real.

https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2021/jun/25/ufo-report-pentagon-security-experts-reaction 

4: Note how such information is coming from sources whose core principle and M.O. is SECRECY!  They have been hiding and using advanced knowledge and technology for themselves, and they are not inclined to share because they think it gives them strategic advantages.  They are only reluctantly sharing limited information because they recognize that people are becoming more aware, and they are trying to steer them away from certain truths and ideas that they do not want in the public spotlight.  Such covert organizations have been doing some very negative things that they would rather people not know about.  Their actions are actually a bigger threat than the ET's they are trying so desperately to get people to fear.  (It's like a serial killer being caught and accusing their neighbor of being the real killer to draw attention away from themselves.)

https://www.pbs.org/newshour/show/we-may-not-know-if-aliens-exist-but-ufos-still-pose-a-national-security-risk 

5: Note that stories about such sightings and subjects are still coming out, but are often buried and hard to find compared to so much celebrity gossip, political division, sports and entertainment, or other fear-inducing stories (COVID, climate change, violence, etc.) that are pushed to the fore-front of mainstream “news” sources.  I use quotes around that word because a lot of it is not actually news, but carefully crafted lies, false narratives, misinformation, propaganda, smoke and mirrors, etc.  When these kinds of stories are actually covered, they sometimes undercut the importance and profound implications by showing silly cartoons or people with goofy hair and clothes so that people don't take them seriously (like in the above article).  Or they show people who look scared or use images and music with foreboding tones to suggest dread and negativity.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/outlook/ufo-report-aliens-seti/2021/06/09/1402f6a8-c899-11eb-81b1-34796c7393af_story.html

6: Note the attempts to manipulate human behavior.  This article suggests “doom and gloom”, and rejects the very foundation of all good relationships and diplomacy: communication.  That is a fundamentally negative approach and point of view, revealing the close-minded thinking of the people behind such media.  Attempting to scare people away from investigating or communicating is a clear sign of a cover-up.  Fear limits your consciousness.  If you have no fear and research with an open mind and heart, you will find many ET’s sharing love and wisdom with whoever will listen.  But if you are not tuned to that kind of information, if you are instead focused on fear or other things, then you are not able to perceive such positive messages.  There are countless people “channeling” ET intelligence through a very common form of communication: telempathy (using both thoughts and feelings).  If you refuse to believe such things are possible, that closes you off from more awareness of them.  Many people have also had positive encounters in person, but if you have too much fear in you then such experiences will seem more negative.

https://www.hollywoodreporter.com/lifestyle/arts/luis-elizondo-ufo-book-1235012266/

7: Note the variety of sources covering these subjects in the same way.  It doesn't matter if you call them conservative, progressive, scientific, financial, or entertainment media, they are ALL influenced by certain agendas being promoted through them.  Note the unified, monolithic message that permeates them, indicating that they are just different mouth-pieces for the same people who use them like you use social media for your own interests, just on a much bigger scale.  You may think having millions of followers is impressive, but certain groups and individuals who are never mentioned in mainstream media are using it to socially influence BILLIONS of people every day.  When you know this, you seek out and find better, less manipulative sources of information that expand and free your mind rather than trying to control it.

William Shatner is NOT the oldest person to go to space (and other media lies)

Today, the former Star Trek star barely left the planet by dipping his toe into the “kiddie pool” of the cosmos.  Spending a few minutes outside Earth’s orbit only JUST qualifies as going to space, but this is mostly a publicity stunt by Blue Origin and Jeff Bezos.  Like a lot of news, it is truth mixed with lies.  Yes, William Shatner actually made the trip, but he is not the oldest person to have gone to space.  Who is?  It’s an unanswerable question, but I know there are older ones.  I’ll explain.

Like many “truths” and “facts”, people think they know certain things but really they just have the illusion of knowledge.  Much of what is called “history” is actually not true; it is just stories that people believe until they learn enough to recognize that they do not know.  Beliefs and stories are NOT knowledge.  This applies to so many titles and “records” people claim that are actually incorrect, but they either don’t know any better or they are going along with the lie.

The President of the U.S. is NOT “the most powerful person on Earth” as is claimed.  Those who are called the richest or the oldest are actually eclipsed by individuals who are not widely known.  Many famous “assassins” did not actually kill the people they supposedly did (they are just “scape goats” or fall guys for conspiracies so the public doesn’t know who the real killers are).  Neil Armstrong was not first on the moon, and William Shatner is not the oldest to go to space.  These false stories are told to keep people believing lies, so they don’t recognize greater truths.

Don’t get me wrong, MOST people don’t even know they are lying.  They wholeheartedly believe such incorrect “trivia” because it’s all they have ever heard.  Only when you find more sources of information, dig deeper, research extensively, and make new discoveries do you replace what you thought you knew with greater wonders and truths that are beyond such simple stories and answers.  You see that certain questions do not have answers because the questions themselves are based on false presumptions, misinformation, and lower level consciousness.  Often, asking more questions reveals the limited nature of the thinking behind the question.

Who is the most powerful person on Earth?  Is there only one?  How do you measure power?  Can it be measured?  However you measure it, The U.S. President is not the most powerful, but some believe that because they don’t know any better and haven’t learned other things to “see through” that lie.  Not only are there more influential people on this planet, but everyone has their OWN power.  Some are simply using their power to convince others that they have more power than they do!  And some are using theirs to stay out of the public spotlight and let others take the blame and recognition for their actions.

Who are the richest and the oldest people on Earth?  Definitely not who many people think.  There are some with much more money and many more years than what is claimed to be the most.  Again, some questions are not even answerable when you really think about them.  Are you just measuring one currency?  There are international bankers who control so much money in so many different currencies that you can’t even calculate it because the value is completely arbitrary and different.  Plus, between interest, earning, and spending, the amounts are constantly changing!  As for who the oldest are, there are some whose ages many people would not believe (which actually limits their consciousness).  These are mostly elders in indigenous tribes who are much more connected to nature and the planet, which aids in longevity much more than living in overpopulated, stressful, less natural cities.  Again, I can’t give precise names or numbers, because I don’t know them, I just know they exist.  If I said the highest ages I have heard from a very reliable source, you would probably think it’s impossible and dismiss me as not credible.  But given everything else I have learned, I find the information very credible and believable.

I can’t get into all the assassinations which have taken place and how many of the alleged killers were set up to take the fall for other individuals.  I’ll simply focus on one of the more famous ones from the last century.  Lee Harvey Oswald did NOT kill John F. Kennedy.  You have probably only seen a very choppy, blurry, and cropped film of that infamous event.  I have seen a much clearer, uncut copy where it is quite obvious that the real shooters were the planted agents in the front seat of the limo.  This actually makes more sense, as it explains why Mrs. Kennedy was trying to climb over the back of the car.  If she thought the bullets were coming from somewhere else, her reaction would have been to duck down and take cover rather than expose herself to more gunfire in the open and risk further damage by falling to the hard road from a moving vehicle.  But she saw that the shooters were IN the car with them, which makes her behavior completely logical.  She was threatened into withholding this information from the public, and the two planted agents were also killed soon after, as they were "loose ends".



So who was behind the complex hit that framed a single man?  A group that does not have just one name, but several: Majestic 12, MJ-12, Majic (majority intelligence committee), to name a few.  Certain members were more responsible than others, but their top secret documents clearly indicate ill intentions toward JFK using his secret service code name: "LANCER has made some inquiries regarding our activities which we cannot allow."

Back to the many lies of space, Neil Armstrong is given undue credit as being first on “the moon”.  (“Earth’s moon” is more specific, as there are countless moons; but most people on this planet just know it as “the” moon.)  However there were already people there both from this planet, and others.  This is a huge subject, but the moon has been used as a monitoring satellite for eons.  Note that it does not rotate like most other celestial bodies, but it orbits with the same face always toward Earth.  This anomaly is a clue (for those able to decipher it) that the moon is intelligently controlled.  Various civilizations inhabit the moon, especially on the side facing away from the planet in order to be less noticeable.  The Apollo astronauts discovered this but were sworn to secrecy (which explains some of their awkward press conferences and behaviors).  But even if these beings were not already there, other Earth people already made it to the moon before the Apollo missions.  Decades before, Germans acquired and built out a base on the moon.  I probably would not have believed that myself until I learned about their secret haunebu spacecraft, their base/city in Antarctica (base 211/Neuschwabenland), or their association with extra-terrestrials.  Many people clearly have not learned about these things yet either, but others have because I learned from them.

Related to William Shatner not being the oldest Earth person in space, one of the many secret developments that has occurred in covert, “black-budget”, non-publicized programs is the revolutionary field of life extension.  “Aging” is a product of a combination of environmental conditions, bodily toxins (which affect cellular integrity), psychology, beliefs, etc.  These factors are not optimal for many people on Earth, but when you improve them you improve health and longevity.  Basically when you think, eat, and live in healthier ways, you naturally live longer and do not necessarily look a certain way just because you are a certain age.  You know that different people age differently depending on what they do and don’t do.  Now extrapolate that beyond what you think you know and you will see that humans have the ability to live MUCH longer than the people who are claimed to be the oldest.

On this subject, I can give more specificity and sources to research.  Many insiders or “whistle-blowers” have discussed their experience with life extension and secret space programs (SSP’s).  Before dying, William Tompkins talked about his time at TRW working on such developments and that many medical companies were secretly involved.  Johan Fritz has discussed his military space service under someone he just called “the old man” in numerous German SSP’s (Nachtwaffen and Kruger) which are descendants of those earlier ones mentioned above (who already had life extension projects back in WWII).  Randy Cramer has been authorized to disclose certain information about his work in the US Marine Corps Special Section and Mars Defense Force, and that some of his superiors were over 100 years old and that you were not supposed to talk about their age.  Randy makes a good point that if people like him were lying about their service, they would be locked up for impersonating an officer because the military considers that a serious crime.



All of these examples hint at the fact that a lot of news, history, facts, and truths are actually lies.  This is symbolized in movies like “The Matrix” where reality is MUCH different than what many people believe.  Their perception is based on limited and inaccurate information that they unknowingly think is factual and accurate.  Again, the nature of physical reality is illusion, or completely relative and depends on your own consciousness, energy frequency, information, beliefs, etc.  It is also not fixed, and is ever-evolving.

Mr. Shatner may believe he is the oldest man to go to space, but many of us know that is not really true; it is just a narrative that is being told.  Such is the power of beliefs and stories, they shape your view of yourself and reality.  What you believe is what you perceive.  Conversely, you cannot perceive what you do not believe.  If you do not believe in all the other beings in the cosmos, that prevents your recognition of them until your consciousness is ready.  Some of them live for thousands of years, others even more.  This radically changes your perspective of age, time, and other things as well.  So even if someone from Earth who is 1000 years old goes to space, they may be the oldest from Earth to do so, but they will never be the oldest in space!

People are at different stages of development and awareness.  Not everyone is ready to know the same things, and that’s perfectly fine.  Your learning, readiness, and reality are all up to you.  It can be challenging at first to realize that what you thought you knew was not actually true.  But that leads to greater truths, discoveries, awareness, and amazement at the infinite nature of the universe and yourself.

Vaccine Ingredients, What "Pharmaceutical" Means, and The Negativity and Futility of Mandates

This is a list of ACKNOWLEDGED ingredients in three common COVID vaccines.  We'll get into UNacknowledged ingredients later, but even without those, do you know what these components are and how your body reacts to them?  Do these complex looking letters and numbers seem appealing, natural, or like something you want injected into you?  Do you believe all these ingredients are somehow healthy for everyone, or even SOME people?  Do you think it's wise to put things in your body without knowing what they are just because someone in a suit or a white coat told you to?  Do you think vaccines are somehow the only thing that cannot be weaponized?  Do you falsely and naively believe that the intentions of pharmaceutical companies are entirely positive and pure?

With an expanded definition of that industry, do you still trust its products and intentions?  Do you still think mandating artificial ingredients and poison is a good idea?  Why are there are no mandates for healthy eating, exercise, or laughter?  The same reasons that you cannot mandate those things are the same reasons that you cannot mandate pharmaceuticals.  Everyone is their own unique being; what helps one hurts another.  Penicillin, cats, different foods, etc.  People have completely different reactions to everything.  So why is there such a push to make everyone get shots?  Because of what’s in them.  Many people have NO idea what they are putting in their bodies including doctors, politicians, the salespeople who influence them, and the public who has been subjected to such aggressive, fear-based marketing.  That's a BIG red-flag.  Why would people be so eager for a product when they don’t even know the ingredients?  The same reason why people let the Trojan Horse into their city, not knowing there were soldiers hidden inside, and why American Indians took blankets not knowing they were infected with smallpox: IT’S A TRICK.  These are all weapons made to seem like gifts.  They are given under the guise that they are for the benefit of the public, when the true intention is the exact opposite.

If I told you UNLISTED ingredients that have been in vaccines for years and why they are being so heavily promoted, many people would not even believe me because they cannot fathom how this could be done.  But the more you seek, research, and question with an open mind and heart, the more ingredients you will find that do not sound appealing.  Below is an info-graphic of some claims that have been made over the years.  Instead of just rejecting them as impossible, I suggest actually investigating for yourself.  Truth can be ugly, but it is also empowering.  You must use your own discernment and ask yourself, “Why would I put something in my body without knowing what’s in it?  Why does so much media not discuss the ingredients more, but only suggest that they are all perfectly good for everyone?  And why is there such a strong effort to force people to do something, which is the ANTI-THESIS of a free society, and which violates both logic and the sovereign, innate, free will of choice?”  Such questions lead to the conclusion that this agenda is not coming from positive sources, and that forcing or attempting to force anything is inherently unrealistic and negative.

These ingredients are not in ALL vaccines, but do your diligent research and you will discover that they are in many.  But there is one additional component to many shots that is not even shown in the above graphic.  Using a particular word to describe this ingredient has gotten numerous people censored and de-platformed for even suggesting it, which to me gives credence to all the sources I've heard mention this "additive" since it is not a crime to accuse or suggest; but some are clearly afraid for people to even consider the possibility that this is the case.  Instead of using the "taboo" word, here's a clue:

Note that a particular well-known representative of the technology industry is a major proponent of widespread vaccination.  This is because there is a form of technology attempting to be introduced to the human body through every possible avenue.  Some people are so invested in technology that they merge with it to the point of eliminating their ability to procreate.  Not everyone goes down this path, but many do because the path seems shortsightedly good at first and they are not looking further down the road to see the "dead end".

These mandates are NOT about public health, they are about private interests and agendas.  They are about power, profit, and population control (which does not always mean killing people, just manipulating their behavior).  Remember that the etymology of “govern-ment” is MIND CONTROL!  If public health is so important, why is there so much unhealthy food, drink, products, and media?  Why are vaccines suddenly the first things ever that are good and necessary for all people?  Because they are not; that is just an idea being promoted through so much media to get people to believe that.  Why?  Because of the "secret ingredients" which serve negative agendas.  See the above etymology of “pharmaceutical”, which some translate as witchcraft, sorcery, poison, drugs, etc.  These corporate drug dealers have convinced many people to trust them through massive bribes and payouts, political lobbying, constant marketing, nondisclosure agreements, scientific fraud, covering up their crimes with legal manipulation, and even going so far as to discredit and kill doctors who promote and prescribe treatments they do not want the public to know about.  People only trust these incredibly corrupt institutions when they do not know how corrupt and untrustworthy they are.

Notice that it is often called the MEDICAL industry, which indicates the focus of many within it on MEDICINE more than people.  For many, their motives are more about personal profit than public health.  If they were doing a good job, why is there so much disease?  Because it is less of a “health care” system, and more of a disease-management system.  Because the industry sees more profit in disease than in health; it wants people constantly needing expensive drugs and treatments.  It THRIVES on disease.  It is clear from the FDA's own website that it is a tool used by manufacturers to bring their products to market.  That organization is literally about administering food and drugs.  People have a misplaced belief that the FDA exists to serve the public; but as the name suggests, it really serves the food and drug industries.  And notice that one of the categories it supposedly regulates is "radiation-emitting devices".  First, this includes electronic devices which you will probably recognize do NOT qualify as either food or drugs.  Second, if they are regulating them, they are doing a TERRIBLE job, because all the mobile phones, wi-fi, and cell towers are CONSTANTLY emitting radiation.  In addition to the ABUNDANCE of unhealthy ingredients in countless foods and drugs, it is clear that the FDA approves whatever they are paid/told to approve, regardless of the negative health effects on people or the planet.



Lastly, notice that a mandate is not a law.  Even if it is made law, look at how many laws exist which people do not obey.  What use are laws then?  They are attempts to control behavior, but clearly they do not work.  And if mandates are not even laws, what power do they have?  Only the power people believe they have.  Some people simply would like to control others, not recognizing or respecting their own free-will and intelligence.  And some people simply go along with mandates because they do not recognize or respect their OWN free-will and intelligence, believing that others know better than they do what is best for them.  But CLEARLY there are many different kinds of people, beliefs, behaviors, and value systems, so it is fundamentally IMPOSSIBLE to impose ANY action on all people.  Those who attempt to do so have deep-seeded fear, weakness, and ignorance to believe that they somehow can or should decide for everyone.  And that is the end of that!

9/11 Was Controlled Demolition "False-Flag" by Military-Industrial Complex, Blamed on Rogue Muslims to Justify Invasion, War

 

Twenty years ago, the military-industrial complex executed yet another false-flag attack in order to bolster more military action and funds.  I have mentioned this strategy before which some call "problem, reaction, solution", where an organization creates a problem, elicits a public reaction through mass media, and promotes their solution for the problem they created.  This is what Eisenhower and many others have been warning about with regards to the MIC.  Calling 9/11 an "inside job" is only partially true, but it is NOT entirely true; as it involved American, Israeli, British, Saudi, and other international intelligence, industrial, military, and media assets to pull off such an operation.  It wasn't just about money, or oil, or opium, or fear, or distraction... it was about ALL of those things and more for different interests.

Aside from the "why" and "who" behind 9/11, learning HOW it was done helps to reveal those things.  News media is still lying about this two decades later, because they are heavily influenced by those who are actually responsible who clearly don't want others to know that.  Examining some simple physics of the event shows it was a hoax.  No planes in history have EVER brought down buildings like the WTC (and they still haven't, since those planes were simply used to trick people into believing they caused the collapse).  Similar (and even smaller) buildings have been hit by such planes without falling.  Both the planes AND buildings were designed and built to prevent such incidents.  The impact explosions everyone saw was the jet fuel burning up instantly, which could NOT melt industrial steel and concrete even if it burned for hours.  The THREE towers which collapsed on 9/11 were brought down by controlled demolition, and anyone who thinks otherwise simply does not know enough about the physics involved or the massive and constant manipulation of media to convince people of lies.  If you still believe Bin Laden was the mastermind, then you have fallen for such lies.  The real terrorists of 9/11 (and the world) are still inciting fear, hatred, division, violence, and ignorance every day through the news...

Media narratives are heavily influenced by negative, hierarchical, power-hungry agencies, corporations, individuals and their agendas.  What the public is told is NEVER the entire truth, and is often lies and misdirection to keep people ignorant and to manipulate their behavior and political influence.  Those who dig deeper and do their own research have a better idea what's really going on, and are able to see more than those who unquestioningly accept what they are told by the talking heads on the news (who are mostly mouthpieces for others, reading what is approved, towing the official line they have been given, saying whatever they are paid to say).  Even “alternative” sources of information have been infiltrated and co-opted by aggressive organizations who consistently use lies, fear, and confusion as their primary weapons.  This psychological warfare is applied to every subject and situation, like the current "plandemic".  Every opportunity is taken by extremely negative entities to feel power over others by influencing their behavior.  To be unaware that this is happening means you are more susceptible to it.  Countless people are being tricked because they do not know how such tricks work.

False-flag operations have been used throughout history to incite wars and increase military spending and action.  So many terrorist attacks and assassinations have been carried out by certain groups who blame and frame others for them so they escape punishment.  Using a global network of technology and agents embedded in media, governments, companies, universities, covert agencies, and every other sector of society, a very limited and incorrect narrative is repeated over and over as a cover story to hide the real motives and perpetrators.  This tricks a large enough percentage of the public into going along with the false story and unknowingly supporting agendas they otherwise would not if they knew they were being massively deceived.  For those who see through the trick and tell the truth, they are either ignored or dismissed as "kooks", "conspiracy theorists", "unpatriotic", or some other slanderous label.  This keeps the momentum of the operation going by those who believe the lies wholeheartedly and do not recognize the truth which is far more intricate and multi-dimensional than they are able to see.

SIMPLE LIE: 9/11 was carried out by Muslim extremists who hi-jacked planes and crashed them into buildings.
COMPLEX TRUTH: 9/11 was a highly coordinated military intelligence operation involving various international agencies directed by private parties who turned commercial aircraft into remote drones, destroyed THREE World Trade Center offices using controlled demolition (building #7 is rarely mentioned because it's a big clue), targeted a specific section of the Pentagon with a missile (footage of which was mostly confiscated), immediately closed off the crime scenes and removed crucial evidence that would expose the lie, and bombarded their "official" version of events throughout the global media in order to generate public support for invasion under the guise of "anti-terrorism".

Another common tactic throughout history has been to create a "scapegoat" who is publicly flogged and solely blamed for the actions of covert groups.  Osama Bin Laden, Lee Harvey Oswald, John Wilkes Booth, Sirhan Sirhan, Timothy McVey, all of these men and many more were falsely identified as "masterminds" of villainous plots.  In actuality, the real masterminds and villains have been organizations and individuals who do not want their participation in such violent acts known to the public; so they offer up sacrificial "stooges", "patsies", or "fall-guys" in their place.  This is how such conspiracies continue to happen, because those who carry them out remain hidden by placing the blame on others.  If a doctor mistakenly amputates a healthy limb instead of an infected one, the infection remains.  Another analogy would be a host not knowing it had a parasite that is influencing the host's behavior to do what the parasite wants.

Much of what people call "history" is actually lies that have been told so much that many people believe they are true because it is all they have heard.  Limited information creates a limited and inaccurate view.  This is why there are seemingly so many conspiracy "theories", because there are so many conspiracies!  Some are indeed crafted to discredit and confuse people, but many of them are actually based on truth which some people are not capable of understanding.  The word "conspire" simply means "to breath together".  It reflects an agenda of any number of people, even just one.  Like anything else, conspiracies are simultaneously positive, negative, and neutral depending on the perspective of different individuals and their relationship to the conspiracy.  So in a sense, EVERYTHING could be called a conspiracy, an orchestration, a co-creation, or some other such label.  The more research you do and the more you learn, the more conspiracies you discover.  Even things you previously thought were just "accidents" or "random" incidents are revealed to have been co-ordinations, like the explosions of the Challenger space shuttle and Chernobyl, or the sinking of the "Titanic" (which was actually the Olympic, swapped with its sister ship for the purpose of insurance fraud).
 

September 11^th is yet another date/event that lives "in infamy", but many peoples' views and memories of it are false, carefully crafted to mislead them from knowing deeper truths, and to trick them into believing lies.  Such masterful deception is as impressive as it is harmful; for people not knowing how things work is a great source of struggle and suffering.  Ignorance of the real methods and perpetrators involved allows them to continue such tricks that could be called "dark magic".  Like many famous magicians, their tricks only work on those who don't know how they work.  When you know all the physics and factors that are often hidden through misdirection and special effects, you see through the "smoke and mirrors" and do not fall for the trick.  You recognize that the "official narrative" is actually ridiculous because jet fuel is designed to burn up on impact and does not even come close to reaching the melting temperature of the industrial materials used in such buildings.  Thus, the only logical conclusion is that the buildings came down because of controlled demolition, which matches exactly what people saw: skyscrapers collapsing at free-fall speed into their own footprint.  This also matches the reports done by independent scientists who took samples of the air particles and found blasting residue.  Of course, this was not reported by most news sources because it reveals the hoax, just like the recordings of the first responders capturing multiple explosions going off in the towers.  Building #7 was only covered briefly where they actually admitted it was destroyed by controlled demolition!  They claimed it was hit by debris and had to be brought down for "safety", but notice how quickly that happened; because it had already been rigged to collapse (to destroy evidence and cover the tracks of the real perpetrators).


Note how these details are MUCH more complex than the simple narrative that has been repeated on the news.  Such a one-dimensional explanation is a clue that it is false, because reality is NOT one-dimensional.  Imagine if everyone knew these things BEFORE 9/11.  Soldiers would not have signed up to fight, armies would not have invaded the Middle East, and many people would not have died for yet another massive lie constructed by entities who continue to operate.  International bankers and intelligence agencies were involved, but they were not solely responsible either, for there are layers and levels to everything.  Again, blaming a particular person or organization does no good when everything is more of a multi-dimensional coordination.  But KNOWING how things actually work is crucial.  If you do not know how a computer works, your ability to use it is limited.  So knowing how governments, media, militaries, corporations, banks, schools, hospitals, and other institutions are all interconnected is essential to seeing how events are really carried out and how they serve various interests.  This helps you better understand and see things more clearly.  Otherwise you are operating under false pretenses and incorrect views, which means you are vulnerable to more exploitation and tricks.  In other words, behavior is more effective and appropriate with more accurate information.

How has my behavior improved from knowing such things?  My consumption of mainstream news and media has decreased substantially since I learned just how full of lies and propaganda it is.  I only get it in small doses until I've heard enough manipulation and negativity; then I either turn it off and go outside in nature, or switch to more enlightening media.  It is much like discovering the food you have been eating for years is full of toxins and unhealthy artificial ingredients (which are also prevalent); it can be shocking and discouraging at first, but ultimately you are better for knowing that and it motivates you to find healthier options.  Just as cutting out junk food from your diet makes your body healthier, cutting out predominantly negative media makes your mind healthier; and doing both has an exponential effect that transforms you into a much better person.  It also transforms your view of reality, seeing things much more clearly, deeply, and magically.  Knowing more than other people can have its challenges; when they do not know you are telling the truth, they sometimes mock or ignore you.  But that only affects you to the extent that you let it.  Knowing more than others also has distinct advantages.  Becoming smarter and healthier makes you a better guide to help others do the same.  You will find people who actually acknowledge and appreciate your intelligence.  It's a mixed bag of some thinking you're crazy or foolish, and others recognizing you have genuine knowledge and wisdom.  Ultimately what you think of yourself is more important than what others think of you.  But between those two responses, positive reinforcement and appreciation are certainly more pleasant!

"COVID-19 - The System" Documentary Transcribed

The following are my favorite quotes from the documentary “COVID19 – The System”.  I have transcribed it for four main reasons:
1. It's a Dutch film, and is not widely available on many platforms for people to easily find.
2. Even if they could find it, many people will not watch it since they don't speak Dutch.

3. Many also don't want to read the subtitles to a foreign movie.
4. It's really good and I agree with most of it (ending with the phrase "back to normal" is a bit regressive, considering the progressive solutions offered by the featured experts.)

So I have condensed the most important points down to the size of an article.  This excellent research parallels my own.  They have consulted many sources beyond the mainstream ones which are highly controlled by vested interests who use media for their own agendas.  These quotes come from doctors, scientists, economists, researchers... NOT paid representatives of mega-corporations or the institutions they fund and use to influence the public.  In other words, this is a much more complete, unbiased, rational look at the situation.  This is not just about a virus, but also money, power, media, technology, and how these are all being used to dominate and manipulate the masses through fear and fraud.

“Why pursue this policy when there are many more non-COVID victims than COVID victims?  Is this really about our public health?  Clearly the pharmaceutical industry's business model is to make profit.  As much profit as possible.  It's got nothing to do with health care.  If it did, they would have made sure to produce good medicines.  The new products they've put on the market are generally poison.  Nothing more.  If you look closely at the characteristics of the virus, the measures taken and consequences are out of proportion with the virus itself.  This is certainly a time full of danger, fear, change and transition.  The virus triggered this, but the consequences are much greater.  That's what we need to look at.  They're drastic.  When people talk about COVID-19 it's positioned more or less as an enemy.  At first when we didn't know what was coming, they said: 'This is war.  We have to fight it, eliminate it.'  I thought: Hm, what is this virus?  I didn't know either.

Viruses play a key role in nature.  If you look at the timeline, viruses and bacteria have been around far longer than homo sapiens.  Looking at how we're built, in terms of our immune system it becomes clear how incredibly well they work together.  In nature it's all about collaboration: between cells, bacteria, viruses.  Yes, collaboration is one of the key processes in nature.  That collaboration arose in the process of evolution.  Apparently it was a better way of organizing than the other options we had.  Other organisms are much older.  Now humans are here.  I sometimes feel that we want to be at the top and to be able to engineer humankind.  You see it with the virus, 'We're going to wipe it out.'  Is that even possible?  If we really want to, it's possible.  It's hard with a virus.  It's much easier to wipe out pandas or rhinos or tigers.  Viruses are so closely linked to us that they keep adapting and evolving.  The flu virus is a good example.  For the flu jabs we have now, we have to guess what flu virus is coming but it's often quite different.  After so many centuries we still can't predict what it will do.  Viruses are often too fast for us.  Viruses survive because they mutate.  That's why it's so hard to develop a vaccine or medicine or a treatment.  You don't know which direction it will go.  You see that with flu vaccines.  You think: Hey, it works.  But next time, it's changed again.”

“When the Outbreak Management Team (OMT) was set up I was surprised that they spoke very little about public health.  It was all about virologists.  That makes sense because it's a virus, I get that.  But public health is about much more than just a virus.  There's much more to ensuring we're healthy.  There are the lifestyle diseases and so on.  The other strange thing was the social and economic side.  As an entrepreneur I knew that what was said would have a big impact.  That wasn't mentioned.  Then it transpired that the other experts weren't in the OMT.  That was so strange.  That's when I started searching for information myself.  Eventually we were doing research with 20 scientists in four countries.  It was great, we got so much information.  Everyone had their own task.  We had data scientists, people looking at economics, accountants, there were doctors among the scientists and economists.  It was amazing.  In just eight weeks we got a clear picture of what was going on.  The big question for me was: What actually happens?  What does the virus do to the body?”

“There are various different aspects of the immune system you have to look at... T-cells play a huge role.  They cause a kind of cross-reaction that originates in previous coronavirus infections.  Because there are a large number of these viruses that are all slightly different.  That's what the immunity is built on.  The T-cell recognizes parts of the coronavirus... That means that other people who have never seen the new variant can still demonstrate defense based on that.  That turned out to be 40-60%, based on T-cells.  It was interesting that on the news only immunoglobulin was mentioned, which is made by B-cells that are measured in the blood.”

“This is essentially almost a classic immunity built up against viruses, the kind we see all the time.  The whole world pursued more or less the same policy.  There were two reasons for this.  First, the WHO.  There's a lot of pharma money in the WHO, so they're not impartial.  The same happened in 2009.  They decide what the status of a virus is.  Back then they classified swine flu as Pandemic A: life-threatening.  It proved not to be, but many vaccines were produced and they were all sold.  There was uproar about that, because in hindsight it was all wrong.  That wasn't how things were.  It was just pharma money pulling the strings.  We don't seem to have learned anything, as it's happening again now.  The strange thing is that the rules for that have been adapted.  Looking back, as our citizens' initiative shows, the WHO doesn't want social distancing and lock-downs.  It's in a publication from 2019.  That's not the way to go.  But they changed it nonetheless.  Very odd.  They decide the policy for 193 countries.  The panic and copying each other is all a part of that too.”

“It was clear after those three weeks who the high-risk groups were: elderly people with an illness were the ones who fell ill and were hospitalized.  And a very big group of healthy people, the economic workforce really weren't very much affected.  Some were, but far fewer than victims of road accidents... It was clear this was about more than public health.  And it's only a small part of public health.  If you look at lifestyle and road traffic deaths there are many more things that affect public health.  It was odd that we didn't look at the social and economic aspects too.  Because imposing lock-downs like this has quite an impact on your economy.  Why aren't these experts being consulted?”

“The crazy thing was that the newspaper said that the T-cells need to be jump-started by the vaccine.  I thought: this is too much.  So it's not important if we have natural T-cells, but if we make a vaccine it has to encourage the T-cells to become active?  I'm at a complete loss.”

“The pharmaceutical industry makes an enormous profit on its products.  If that benefited people's health, you'd say: fair enough, who cares.  But there are increasing signs that medicines play a key role in the falling life expectancy in the United States and stagnating life expectancy in the European Union.  We've seen big scandals around Vioxx, Rofecoxib, a simple painkiller, the medication for diabetes: rosiglitazone, Avandia.  Countless medications have cost hundreds of thousands of people their lives.  It just keeps on going.  You would think that after all of those tragedies the rules would be tightened.  They're not, in fact they're being relaxed.

So pharma is a great business model... it's largely due to patents...  They've made agreements with the registration authorities about the requirements they have to meet.  These days, the European Medicines Agency or EMA in Amsterdam, the Food and Drug Administration or FDA in America say very clearly on their websites that they want to help manufacturers to bring their product onto the market.  That's a very strange situation.  You would expect organizations like this to put the citizens first.  To only approve medicines that have been proven to work and that have the fewest possible side effects...  A company called Gilead, the company that also put sofosbuvir, Sovaldi for the treatment of Hepatitis C on the market... production costs: 150 euros.  A course of treatment costs 80,000 euros.  Those are the kinds of companies and people we're dealing with.

If you look at our overreaction, we've seen that COVID-19 causes a reaction mostly in people with weaker immune systems.  Worldwide the people who die have an average age of 80, 80.5 with a lot of underlying conditions.  Is that comparable with a bad case of flu?  It is, in fact.  The people who die in yearly flu outbreaks are mainly elderly with co-morbidity, in other words other illnesses, and who use other medicines, or co-medication.  That has been the case with flu for years.  The people who die are mainly residents of nursing homes.  And it's the same with this illness, this coronavirus pandemic.”

“AstraZeneca is a company like so many others actually, like GlaxoSmithKline, that are regularly linked to serious fraud, especially scientific fraud...  Another thing I noticed during my research is that these pharmaceutical companies have an incredible marketing apparatus... their representatives visit doctors.  They're very good at it.  The pharmaceutical industry is extremely powerful.  They have a lot of power and money and because of that they're able to promote and market their new treatments very effectively.  And it works.  It really works.  Otherwise they wouldn't keep doing it.  Doctors are susceptible to marketing.  Often they don't have expert knowledge, they can't assess the research and they rely on what they're told by medical sales representatives and medical opinion leaders...  In fact when I was still practicing I was told by the medical sales reps that they were assessed on whether the number of prescriptions of their new drug increased in their region.  As well as that there are doctors, specialists who are instructed or employed by the pharmaceutical industry: medical opinion leaders or MOL's who are actively engaged in prescribing the new medications and to market them.  That works well.  It works well in politics, as there are no experts at the Ministry of Health or the House of Representatives.  So they can do as they please.”

“Over the past months the media have headed in a very specific direction.  We're being told news in a very one-sided way.  And I think the media have a pretty big role given the situation we're in.  And that they have a lot of influence on how people feel at the moment...  If you're the editor-in-chief of a major newspaper and you say: 'Due to the pandemic and the government's position, I'm siding with them', that's just state television, you're a state newspaper.  In a crisis, especially, you should check what's going on...  They sow a policy of fear and say: we're all scared, so just do as we say.”

“Look at the media, they should be critical, that's their job.  But they're the helpers.  Is that not a bit strange?  That's what is so disappointing, it's now very clear we no longer have critical media...  We, the vast majority, the ordinary citizens, are not represented.  There's no lobby for us.  Society needs its own lobby.  That's very important, otherwise everything will go to the other lobbies.  But we don't have one.  That's the nice thing about the term 'media': it suggests intermediation...  You want to know what's going on in the world, for when you vote and to join in the chat at the pub.  You need intermediaries for that, and the intermediaries are the media.  The quality of a democracy depends a lot on the quality of the intermediaries.  They need to be well-informed people who have in-depth knowledge... someone who has really done the research and asks critical, probing questions.  That has disappeared... the media should be especially critical during a crisis.  They should be asking whether we are making the right decisions...

To my mind, there's always a triangle: it consists of the cartels, clearly defined and with a clear agenda, and the political decision-makers, and the helpers.  Political decision-makers are supposed to represent the public interest.  But that's not how the game plays out.  Politicians work best in the grey zone... you can keep your options open.  That's one factor.  The other is the lack of rational thinking.  We always assumed that in politics and economics, for example, the decisions made are rational.  But most political decisions are irrational...  Citizens are better informed now.  There's a lot of know-how in society, more than in the cabinet itself... it sounds as if they're talking to pre-schoolers.  That's how it came across to me.  And it was all about fear, fear, fear...  As far as I know, only regimes do that, dictators... it's understandable given the third leg of the triangle.  Cartels have the biggest interest, politicians muddle along, and then there are the helpers, the assistants.  Those are the think-tanks, the lobbyists.  Politics is driven mainly by lobbyists.  There's huge pressure on politicians.  That's why it's such a corrupt game.  All the stakeholders except the public know how to exert influence on them.  And the key helpers in this case especially have been the media.  Helpers are needed because decisions are made not in the interests of the vast majority but of the small minority.  They give a justification.”

“Ultimately, taking into account everything that's going on here you might wonder: is this really about public health?  It's wonderful to be able to help your children grow.  You can only do it if they accept it, if they're okay with it...  The nice thing is that it works because you've set it up based on trust.  That linked in well with what happened around coronavirus.  Politicians should trust society, the way we do: I trust my team and I trust people's autonomy.  They know what they need to do, they like working that way.  That's how you achieve success.  But strangely, the government did the opposite: no trust, no autonomy, restricting freedom...  It's fantastic that my family is giving me the scope to share what we all know with society, to tell people about it, to say: 'Guys, there's another way.'  Why is it our policy that the only hope is a vaccine?  In that case there are other powers at play...

I think the coronavirus is just one part of an action that has now been set in motion that really just pulls the strings tighter from the position of those who are in power at the moment and who want to retain that power whatever the cost and who have certain ideas about what to do with that power, who have a vision of humanity and the future of humanity which they want to bring about in reality.  A few people are going to determine our future effectively taking away our right to self-determination.  Effectively leading us towards a goal set by them with no regard for us.  So our autonomy, coronavirus is being used for that.”

“I want to leave behind the idea that the state looks after us.  The state has no money.  We do that.  The state's money is our tax money.  When they say the government will help to pay for any claims that may arise from the vaccinations... there's now a guarantee that the government will pay the claims.  It's our money.  So we're paying for any claims.  And that means that the pharmaceutical industry is fully exempt...  Since the swine flu in 2009 they've been earning more than any other industry.  But again, it's not about that.  They already have a colossal amount of money.  You simply can't imagine how much money is available at the highest level.  It's not about that; it's about the distribution.  It's about it NOT being distributed.  It's actually about the real economy being bled dry.  If you look at the purchasing power of the average person in recent years it has decreased dramatically.  Why?  Because wages are barely rising, benefits are barely rising, pensions aren't rising, they've been frozen.  But costs are going up: housing costs, energy costs, health care costs.  It's all going up and up and up.  So the pressure on citizens is growing and growing, and the means to live a reasonable life under that pressure are constantly shrinking.  There must already be an awful lot of households that can only afford the bare necessities...  The people with political power don't have that problem.  For now, they still get enough out of the tax trough to afford a good lifestyle.  So they don't understand the problem, or don't want to, or ignore it...

We need to get rid of this system.  This financial system took shape over three centuries ago.  It was set up in the interests of the ruling class.  It was set up as a system to make money available for the kings and the nobility so that they could finance their operations and finance their lifestyle.  It was never actually meant for the people.  The people were the ones who had to pay off the debts incurred by the king and the nobility.  We need to get out of this system and move to a different one.  Because the system we're in now is simply not good for us.  It's a destructive financial system.”

“We can see all around us that these are very big companies earning so much money that it's more than individual countries earn... corporate states.  At the end of the industrial age and the start of the digital age capitalism continued, that's how the new technologies were built.  The really big tech companies are so big, they're becoming so powerful they're more powerful than countries.  For a very long time our society was set up in such a way that rules were made by society, politicians, countries.  They made laws, and businesses had to adapt to the laws to operate there.  That only works if countries are more powerful than companies.  I call them 'corporate states' because they're bigger and more powerful than most countries.  Countries like the Netherlands, Belgium or France have become relatively too small to hold their own against those big companies.  Corporate states behave like states.  They have their own rules and conditions.  They decide where to go, whether to pay tax.  They're deciding more and more.  And countries have to adapt to what corporate states see as their interests.  Those are still partly capitalist.”

“The good news in all this is that the technology we're talking about, digital technology, biotech, a number of technological developments... blockchains, artificial intelligence, they can make the elite more powerful but they can also empower the citizens.  The technology is neutral, it depends on how we use it.  We can use technology to create a decentralized, local economy.  With solar panels and wind we can generate our own energy.  We don't need companies for that, local societies can do it together.  There are robots to make strawberries and tomatoes; you can automate vegetable and fruit production.  We're developing cultured meat, all kinds of technologies that make it possible for local communities to function without the need for the big companies.  The question is: will it go that way?  Or will our generations have to work even harder due to the coronavirus debt?  We have to change the economic model.  That's the old industrial model: you work, get paid, provide a service.  Well-being is financed by that model.  That industrial model will be replaced by a whole new economic model in which we're less dependent on those kinds of parties...

In the past companies were located in a country.  The big issues and companies are no longer in a country.  It's all global.  The world is their playing field and many big issues are global issues.  They used to be national issues.  The climate is a global issue... health care is a global issue.  More and more issues now cross over borders onto the world stage.  But there's no democracy on the world stage.  The big companies aren't democracies.  Nongovernmental organizations act as the public bodies looking after the environment, health and education.  But they're not democracies either.”

“I've seen in this research that the people who made the decisions, and that wasn't 193 countries, it was a few people in the WHO and some important virologists around important politicians.  Mr Drosten, a virologist who invented the PCR test, he has shares in his own company so he has a strong interest in this.  Fauci too has a big interest in pharma in America.  Ferguson in England and Ab Osterhaus in the Netherlands have a big interest.  I don't understand why, when we seek advice about public health, our health, these are the kinds of people that are chosen to tell us what we should do.  If you scare people enough, they can't think straight.  This experiment in fear has been going on... it will be a big problem trying to reverse that in due course.  It's not going to be easy... they're doing it again in this second wave: fear, panic, a kind of experiment...

During our research an article came in from The Lancet.  The Lancet is a leading scientific journal.  In it, they drew the same conclusion that we drew: that it's a syndemic.  Of course, that needs a bit of explaining.  A syndemic means that you have two conditions at the same time.  In this case we had the virus, of course: COVID-19.  It turned out that in addition, the people who were vulnerable all had underlying conditions.  We know now what they are.  They can be cardiovascular disease, cancer, diabetes.  So mainly lifestyle diseases... if you have both those things at the same time it's called a syndemic.  In some cases they can exacerbate each other.  And that's when the problems start.  So what we're dealing with is a syndemic.”

“We have to realize that a lot of things are going to become uncertain.  A lot will change, and the virus is actually the least of the problems.  We're in transition and the politics of the old age doesn't work in the new age.  Major players are making use of this period to safeguard their interests.  There is polarization and tension in society, it's not one big civic movement.  If we want to get through this to a new period and get out of the fear we need to decide to do it together, to help each other and overcome our differences and create a better society.  If we don't take that decision to create a better society, to unite citizens, we'll create scope for parties that want to exploit the uncertain period and the tensions that arise.  It's up to citizens to decide to step up, to unite so we can make something good.  If not, there are powerful forces at work that will take the opportunity to exploit things...  We must make that choice, not let others make it for us.”

Doctor Shows Shocking Image of Post-Vaccine Blood Sample

This video was shared with me by my mother, who was a microbiologist at a pharmaceutical company for years.  I’m not sure you’ll be able to watch it, either because it has been blocked or “fact-checked”, which is the new euphemism for censored.  Or you may be too programmed to believe anything other than the propaganda broadcast constantly throughout mainstream media that has been labeled “news, facts, science, etc.”  On this planet, so much of what is given to the public every day is highly edited and distorted information.  Conversely, so much of what has been censored and removed is very true and accurate.  Those who do this claim it is to protect you from misinformation or “fake news”; that is a lie.  They do this because they do not want you to know truth; they want you focused on what they want you to think is true.

Anyone who claims that keeping things from you is for your protection is clearly acting out of fear-based beliefs, which indicates a negative mindset.  The more information you have, the better decisions you make.  If you go for a hike in the woods, you are better off knowing what animals are in the area, what are the major landmarks, where sources of water are, which plants are edible and which ones are poisonous, etc.  Otherwise you are less prepared and your chances of injury or death increase.  There are large agencies and organizations devoted to acquiring as much information as possible; and part of their operation also involves twisting and hiding information from the public, which they think gives them strategic advantage.  So if someone is keeping information from you, it is not to serve you, but they believe it serves them.

CRITICAL QUESTIONS
Have you seen side-by-side images comparing different kinds of vaccinated and non-vaccinated blood?  Have you thoroughly researched the ingredients of what is being injected into people’s bodies?  Don’t you find it suspicious that such information is not more readily available or discussed?  Are you aware that all major drug companies have paid out MASSIVE amounts of money in settlements for damages caused by their products, and they continuously cover up their negative effects?  Do you remember when cigarette companies convinced many people (including doctors) that smoking was not bad for you?  Have you actually watched any of the content that has been “fact-checked for your protection” (censored to keep you ignorant)?  Are you acting based on many data points and sources, or response-based emotional triggering from repeated media narratives and guilt trips?  Is it smarter to act with much more information and examples, or less?  Is your first reaction to attack and call people names who seem to think differently than you, or do you actually listen to them and understand their point of view?  Have you heard about all the people having adverse reactions to vaccines, or does your “news” never mention those?  Does keeping information from the public seem like a positive strategy, or a negative one?  Do you know that the military-industrial complex is deeply embedded and involved in politics, media, tech companies, schools, the medical community, etc.?  Do you remember the infamous Trojan Horse that seemed like a gift but was secretly a weapon?  Do you actually believe that vaccines are 100% safe for all people and cannot possibly contain any harmful ingredients?  Are you not aware just how many harmful ingredients are in food, drink, air, and drugs that people consume?  Why would vaccines be any different?  Are you trusting people based on their appearance, job title, or air of authority?  Is it wise to blindly and obediently follow an organization or anyone wearing a suit or white coat?  How can any group of people make rules that apply to all others when everyone has their own lives, beliefs, paths, bodies, situations, and abilities?  Are you thinking for yourself, or just doing what has been repeated to you over and over?

I no longer listen to or watch “the news” ever since I learned years ago that it is just as unhealthy and tainted as a lot of the food and drink people consume.  I used to listen to NPR while driving; but now every time I stop on that station, I hear how people are being deceived and manipulated.  Most mainstream media is constantly talking about vaccinations in the same way: as if they are all you need to be healthy, as if diet and stress don’t matter, as if you have no natural immune system, as if there have never been any negative effects of any drugs, as if anyone who does not get a vaccine is a threat to the entire planet, as if anyone who does not trust them is crazy or a terrorist, as if any other opinion than what they say is wrong.  These are clear signs of propaganda, aggressive marketing, and psychological warfare; but some people have fallen for it so they go right along with the programming because it’s all they know.

THE POWER OF FORGIVENESS
Do yourself a favor; when you discover just how much you and countless others have been lied to, forgive the liars and yourself for believing the lies.  Some liars are very convincing and persistent, making it harder for many to perceive the deception.  Those who believe the lies end up lying to others even though they think are telling the truth.  As your consciousness expands, you discover more truths AND lies, and you recognize that some of what you thought to be true is not.  This is why forgiveness is so important not only of others, but of yourself.  It is a recognition that neither you, nor anyone else knows everything.  It is accepting that you have been operating under the illusion of knowledge, and in seeing that, you are better off (though initially, it can be jarring to adjust to a whole new reality or level of awareness).  Forgiveness prevents you from reacting out of a sense of revenge or punishment, which only creates more negativity.  Ego limits many people from recognizing their own limitations and ignorance.  The more you learn, the less ignorant you become, but also the more ignorant you realize you are.  The universe is infinite and ever-evolving, and there is ALWAYS more to learn.  Eventually you reach a point where you no longer need forgiveness because there is nothing to forgive; you understand exactly why everything is as it is.